• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A network load balancer can be used to distribute traffic over your network. It has the capability to transmit raw TCP traffic along with connection tracking and NAT to the backend. Your network can scale infinitely by being able to distribute traffic over multiple networks. Before you pick a load balancer it is crucial to know how they operate. Here are the major types and functions of the network load balancers. They are the L7 loadbalancers, the Adaptive loadbalancer, and Resource-based load balancer.

Load balancer L7

A Layer 7 loadbalancer for networks distributes requests according to the content of messages. Particularly, the load-balancer can decide whether to send requests to a particular server based on URI host, host or HTTP headers. These load balancers work with any L7 interface to applications. For example, the Red Hat OpenStack Platform Load-balancing service is only referring to HTTP and TERMINATED_HTTPS. However any other well-defined interface may be implemented.

An L7 network load balancer consists of the listener and the back-end pools. It takes requests on behalf of all back-end servers and distributes them according to policies that use information from the application to decide which pool should be able to handle the request. This feature allows L7 network load balancers to permit users to customize their application infrastructure in order to serve specific content. A pool can be configured to serve only images and server-side programming languages, whereas another pool could be configured to serve static content.

L7-LBs also have the capability of performing packet inspection which is expensive in terms of latency but it is able to provide the system with additional features. Some L7 load balancers on the network have advanced features for each sublayer, including URL Mapping and content-based load balancing. Businesses may have a pool equipped with low-power CPUs or high-performance GPUs capable of handling simple video processing and text browsing.

Sticky sessions are a common feature of L7 network loadbalers. They are vital for caches and for the creation of complex states. While sessions vary depending on application, a single session may contain HTTP cookies or the properties that are associated with a client connection. A lot of L7 network load balancers can support sticky sessions, however they're not very secure, so careful consideration should be taken when designing an application around them. There are a number of disadvantages when using sticky sessions, however, they can improve the reliability of a system.

L7 policies are evaluated in a particular order. Their order is determined by the position attribute. The request is then followed by the first policy that matches it. If there isn't a policy that matches, the request is routed to the default pool for the listener. If not, it is routed to the error code 503.

Adaptive load balancer

A load balancer that is adaptive to the network has the biggest advantage: it can maintain the best utilization of the bandwidth of links and also utilize an feedback mechanism to correct imbalances in traffic load. This feature is an excellent solution to network congestion since it allows for real time adjustment of the bandwidth or packet streams on links that are part of an AE bundle. Membership for AE bundles can be established by any combination of interfaces like routers that are configured with aggregated Ethernet or specific AE group identifiers.

This technology can identify potential traffic bottlenecks and allows users to enjoy seamless service. A network load balancer that is adaptive can also minimize unnecessary stress on the server by identifying underperforming components and allowing for immediate replacement. It also makes it easier of changing the server's infrastructure, and provides additional security to the website. With these functions, network load balancer a company can easily increase the size of its server infrastructure without downtime. A network load balancer that is adaptive offers performance advantages and requires minimal downtime.

The MRTD thresholds are set by the network architect who defines the expected behavior of the load balancer system. These thresholds are called SP1(L) and SP2(U). To determine the actual value of the variable, MRTD, the network designer creates the probe interval generator. The generator for probe intervals determines the best probe interval to minimize error and PV. After the MRTD thresholds are identified then the PVs calculated will be identical to those found in the MRTD thresholds. The system will adjust to changes in the network environment.

Load balancers can be hardware devices and software-based virtual servers. They are a highly efficient network technology that automatically routes client requests to most appropriate servers to maximize speed and utilization of capacity. The load balancer automatically routes requests to other servers when one is unavailable. The requests will be transferred to the next server by the load balancer. This manner, it allows it to balance the load of the server at different levels of the OSI Reference Model.

Load balancer based on resource

The Resource-based network load balancer is used to distribute traffic among servers that have enough resources to handle the workload. The load balancer asks the agent for information regarding available server resources and distributes traffic accordingly. Round-robin load balancers are an alternative option to distribute traffic among a series of servers. The authoritative nameserver (AN), maintains a list A records for each domain, and provides a unique one for each DNS query. With a weighted round-robin, an administrator can assign different weights to the servers before distributing traffic to them. The DNS records can be used to configure the weighting.

Hardware-based loadbalancers for network load use dedicated servers that can handle high-speed applications. Some are equipped with virtualization to enable multiple instances to be integrated on a single device. Hardware-based load balers also provide high throughput and security by preventing unauthorized access of individual servers. The disadvantage of a hardware-based load balancer on a network is the price. Although they are cheaper than software-based alternatives (and therefore more affordable) you'll need to purchase the physical server along with the installation of the system, configuration maintenance, and support.

If you are using a load balancer on the basis of resources, you need to be aware of which server configuration to make use of. The most commonly used configuration is a set of backend servers. Backend servers can be set up to be in one place and accessible from various locations. Multi-site load balancers will assign requests to servers according to the location. The load balancer will scale up instantly if a server receives a lot of traffic.

There are a variety of algorithms that can be used to find optimal configurations for load balancer server balancers based on resources. They can be divided into two kinds: optimization techniques and heuristics. The authors defined algorithmic complexity as a crucial factor in determining the proper resource allocation for a load balancing algorithm. The complexity of the algorithmic method is important, load balancers and it is the basis for new methods of load balancing.

The Source IP hash load-balancing algorithm takes three or two IP addresses and generates an unique hash key that is used to assign the client to a specific server. If the client is unable to connect to the server it is requesting the session key is recreated and the request is sent to the same server as the one before. The same way, URL hash distributes writes across multiple sites while sending all reads to the owner of the object.

Software process

There are a variety of ways to distribute traffic across the loadbalancer in a network. Each method has its own advantages and drawbacks. There are two primary kinds of algorithms: least connections and least connections-based methods. Each algorithm employs a different set IP addresses and application layers to determine which server a request needs to be sent to. This algorithm is more complex and uses cryptographic algorithms to assign traffic to the global server load balancing that responds fastest.

A load balancer distributes client requests among a variety of servers to maximize their speed and capacity. When one server is overloaded it automatically redirects the remaining requests to another server. A load balancer can also identify bottlenecks in traffic and direct them to an alternate server. It also permits an administrator to manage the server's infrastructure when needed. A load balancer can significantly boost the performance of a site.

Load balancers are possible to be implemented in different layers of the OSI Reference Model. Typically, a hardware load balancer installs proprietary software onto a Server load balancing. These load balancers are expensive to maintain and might require additional hardware from the vendor. Software-based load balancers can be installed on any hardware, even the most basic machines. They can be installed in a cloud load balancing environment. Load balancing can be done at any OSI Reference Model layer depending on the type of application.

A load balancer is an essential component of any network. It distributes traffic across several servers to maximize efficiency. It permits network administrators to add or remove servers without affecting the service. In addition the load balancer permits the maintenance of servers without interruption because traffic is automatically routed to other servers during maintenance. It is an essential component of any network. What is a load-balancer?

A load balancer is a device that operates on the application layer the Internet. The goal of an application layer load balancer is to distribute traffic through analyzing the application-level information and comparing it to the server's internal structure. Application-based load balancers, unlike the network load balancer analyze the request headers and direct it to the best server based on data in the application layer. In contrast to the network load balancer app-based load balancers are more complex and take more time.